Skip to main content

My revision process

Call me crazy, but I don't go back and revise a book manuscript until I've written an entirely new book.

Revision is the hardest part of the process for me, mainly, I think, because I get so married to what I've written. I find I can't really come back to a manuscript and give it the treatment it deserves until I've almost completely purged the thought process that brought it to me from my head. For me, that entails writing a new book.

For me, it's so much easier to approach an older manuscript with fresh eyes if your memory of it is fuzzy. You're able to look at it and find the things you wrote that took you by surprise. You can detach yourself and your ego from the piece and really see the problems, but also really see what works.

Besides that, the only thing that makes you a better writer is more writing and more reading. So if you go back and revise a previous book after you've written a new one and read a dozen more, you'll be much more aware of the problems old-you had in your writing. You'll learn so many things trying something slightly more ambitious every time you set out to write a book that it will make that last book that much better.

The most important thing we can do as writers is to learn. Every book we read, we should look for one thing in our own writing we can do better. Every sentence we write, we should look for the next sentence to be even better. And the hope is that every book is an improvement on the last.

When you attack a manuscript like this, on the heels of the next one, not only are you a better writer, your head is much clearer. As we write, we get wrapped up in the words we use, we get wrapped up in the pacing, we get wrapped up in the characters. Hell, by the time I'm reaching the end of a book, I'm so wrapped up in just trying to finish that I can't even stand up. When you look at those words that first time, right after writing "The End" for the first time, all you can see is the work. But giving yourself that space and perspective before coming back to it removes the baggage. You're able to better focus on honing the characters, the pacing, the story, etc.

But maybe that's just me. I tend to start a book and finish it no matter what, even if I'm only adding 30 or 40 words a day to it.

I've read that the Coen Brothers wrote "The Big Lebowski" over a number of stretches, writing themselves into a corner and then leaving it in a drawer for a long time while they worked on something else. Then they'd pick it up, write themselves into another corner and drop it again. They did this over and over again until they had a draft of their script. It's the same theory, but I'm not quite sure it would work for me, breaking up a story like that.

Maybe you have to stay hyper-focused on your project and simply can't take the time to write another manuscript or you'll lose it completely. I did an interview with Max Allan Collins for this space and he told me about Mickey Spillane's process:
MAC:  [Mickey Spillane] was a guy with a lot of enthusiasm and if he lost his enthusiasm on one story, if he got distracted, he often wrote books in 9 days or 2 weeks, but if he had to stop and go do promotion or something of if he got another idea for a different story he would drop it and just go do the other story. Some of it had to do with the fact that he would say “I’ll get back to this another day” but it was hard for him to get back to something. He did things in the white heat of enthusiasm and if he lost that, he would just start something new.
And that can make sense to you for, I suppose. 

That's the other part of writing: you have to learn what works best for you. What's right for me might not be right for you, but the reason I love reading posts like this from other authors is to see what I can adapt into the process that works for me.

Try it my way once. If you don't like it, worst case scenario, you're sitting on two completed manuscripts. Best case scenario, they're two awesome manuscripts.

As far as my writing this week, I've been working on rewriting and revising the ending of The Aeronaut, which, I believe, is still slated for a July release. I also worked on some pitches for some magazines and other websites. I've also been pretty busy for Big Shiny Robot! and Full of Sith. 

And don't forget to check out any of my books, drop reviews of them on Amazon or Goodreads, and follow me on twitter and Facebook!
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anatomy of an Opening: The End of the Affair

Instead of breaking down a scene from a movie, this time we'll break down the opening of a book. (Previously, I've done scenes from City Lights, Citizen Kane, Raiders of the Lost Ark, and Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.  I've also broken down the opening to Starship Troopers.

Graham Greene's The End of the Affair is absolutely one of my favorite books. The writing is lyrical and story heart-wrenching and beautiful. Greene's style of writing is such that he always has me gripped, whether it's the beginning of the book or the end. And he shows you so much about the character in his opening lines.

So, here are the first two paragraphs from the book:
A story has no beginning or end: arbitrarily one chooses that moment of experience from which to look back or from which, to look ahead. I say 'one chooses' with the inaccurate pride of a professional writer who - when he has been seriously noted at all - has been praised for his technical ability, but d…

The Symbiotic Relationship Between Art and Politics

Art is inherently political.

Let's just get that out of the way. We all have things we want to say (or things we want to not say) in our personal lives that shape the art we make. And artists, more often than not, are trying to say something with their art, even if their goal is to not say something.

There is no doubt that this has been a turbulent week in the country I live in. There are many of us that are confused and shocked and afraid of what might be to come in the future. That's understandable. As artists and writers, I feel like we're typically more empathetic than the general population. It's easy to think about what it's like to be in someone else's shoes because we spend so much of our creative time almost literally in someone else's shoes. And we need to pass that understanding on to our readers or viewers or however else they're consuming this art.

I've seen this troubling idea, though, that art needs to be purely for escape and that p…

Writing is Listening

In many social situations, I'm a talker. I like to think of myself as a raconteur, but it's more just like I don't know how to shut up. At least in the right situation. I've done a lot and know just a little bit about so many different things, it's easy for me to find something to talk about with people. When I can come out of my social anxiety shell, I actually like talking to people. But there are times when I can't really talk, I don't have the energy, emotional or physical, to do it. Instead, I just drink in the surroundings.

I like to listen. I like to observe.

It's something we writers have to do. We have to take in all the input we can. And sometimes that means shutting the hell up and just listening. Listen to your friends tell their stories. Listen to how they talk about other people and describe them. Listen to the words they use. Listen to the emotion in people's voices as they're talking. Watch how they talk. What sorts of things th…