Skip to main content

All Art Has An Agenda


All art has an agenda. 
Some people say that like it's a bad thing, but I'm here to tell you that it's a feature, not a bug. Every piece of writing tells you something about the perspective or worldview of the author. Even the absence of "an agenda" is an agenda.
What brought this on recently? I've seen too many people online upset that the new Ghostbusters film is pushing an agenda of gender equality because every member of the new crew is a female. I honestly can't wrap my head around how this is a bad thing. The movie looks at least mildly entertaining and will probably be at least as good or better than Ghostbusters II. And now my daughter will care more about it, which excites me.
There's literally no downside.
But some are still upset. Why? Because in a society where men hold all the power, no one blinks when there's a team full of men, but when it's all women, suddenly it's not realistic. That's a symptom of something broken in society. And things like this new Ghostbusters movie are small steps in popular representation to fix that.
Next time there's an all-female team of highly competent individuals, the voices calling it unrealistic won't be so loud. They'll be one step more convinced of the reality of the situation. 
A common refrain I hear when I talk about Star Wars is that the real world shouldn't enter into art. That art is inherently escapist and by inserting the politics of the real world into the universe, you're cheapening it. "Star Wars shouldn't bow to pressures of diversity and a social agenda, it should aim to tell a good story first." 
And I think you tell a better story when you're conscious of your agenda. George Lucas knew his agenda for A New Hope was about the Vietnam war. He knew that his agenda for the prequels was about the corrupting influence of money in politics. He knew what he was doing and told cogent stories with these themes. When he was called out for not enough racial diversity, he added Lando Calrissian. We can argue that it wasn't enough and the prequels went a long way in adding to the diverse tapestry of Star Wars and The Force Awakens knocked that ball out of the park.

Gene Roddenberry did the same thing with Star Trek. Star Trek itself is a show that is designed to show us what humanity can do when we put behind us the useless toil of capitalism and work at the higher levels of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. It's a socialist paradise and full of diversity. Diversity was a huge theme for Roddenberry. Remember how shocking it was that a Klingon was on the bridge of the Enterprise when Star Trek: The Next Generation opened? Or how Star Trek had the first kiss on television between white and black people? These ideas seem quaint now. Of course, it's okay for white people and black people to kiss on television. Because Roddenberry's agenda was to make it more socially acceptable. 
But claiming to not have an agenda is an agenda, too.
Consider this: If your science fiction story set in the future is about manly men with ray guns saving damsels in distress, you built a world where sexism wasn't addressed in the past. That's an agenda and not a good one.
If your story in the future is populated full of white people, there must have been a genocide of minorities in the past. That ignores all of the demographic data we have today that says the world is becoming less and less white. Hell, Salt Lake City, the city I live in and one of the least diverse in the country, already has a majority of minorities in its school system and that number increases every year. Ignoring all of that to tell a story set in the future is an agenda on its own. 
Maybe that agenda is merely revealing of your prejudices and world view. Maybe it's more insidious, maybe it's less, but that agendaless agenda exists and is damaging to the forward progression of society.
If your agenda is to write vapid stories that don't address agendas and are nothing but "visceral, gut-level, swashbuckling fun," you're writing from the anti-agenda perspective that preserves the status quo. Does anyone believe the status quo to be a good thing? We want a better tomorrow, don't we? So how would arresting the progressive agendas in our art get us there? If we want a better tomorrow, of course, we'll embrace diversity and gender and racial equality and acceptance of different populations we might not even be aware of currently.
People write from their perspective, even if that perspective is flawed. But the only way to widen perspectives is to show people stories outside of that perspective and to show people a better way. That's why I love Star Wars and Star Trek so much. They show me lessons about the world with their respective agendas. I appreciate these agendas. I read and watch movies to learn, to see things outside of myself and my worldview, to learn to be a better person.
Agendas aren't necessarily bad things. They can be good. Like in Star Wars. Or Star Trek. Or even Ghostbusters now. 
Aim to be more like them. Pay attention to what you're writing and what your agenda is, even if you don't think you have one. 
If it's bad for humanity, don't hesitate to scrap it and start over.

As for my work lately, I have two pieces in the latest issue of Star Wars Insider, the first is the cover story, a dissection of Kylo Ren as a villain with quotes from everyone ranging from Chuck Wendig to C. Robert Cargill. The other is part two of my interview with John Madden and Tom Voegeli, the director and producer of the Star Wars audio dramas.
My latest for HowStuffWorks is another Ridiculous History piece, this one about Simeon Ellerton, a noted pedestrian and rock hound. 
I've also started a Medium account to proliferate some of this writing advice. It wouldn't hurt me at all if you went over there and followed me, read some of the stuff there, and hit the little hearts on it. 
I'll be posting my schedule for Salt Lake Comic-Con's FanX soon, it's huge and Star Wars heavy. There will be many other announcements in the coming days as well.
 ---
As a reminder: The Aeronaut and Escape Vector are still out and still need your purchases and reviews. If nothing else, they can use you telling people about them. If you want signed copies, visit the shop here on this page.

Also! here's the full list of "rules and guidelines" I've been collecting over my years of studying writing advice and process

As far as my work outside of all this: There's a lot of great stuff on Big Shiny Robot! and Full of Sith for you. 

And please, please, please don't forget to check out any of my books, drop reviews of them on Amazon or Goodreads, and follow me on twitter and Facebook!

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Anatomy of an Opening: The End of the Affair

Instead of breaking down a scene from a movie, this time we'll break down the opening of a book. (Previously, I've done scenes from City Lights, Citizen Kane, Raiders of the Lost Ark, and Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.  I've also broken down the opening to Starship Troopers.

Graham Greene's The End of the Affair is absolutely one of my favorite books. The writing is lyrical and story heart-wrenching and beautiful. Greene's style of writing is such that he always has me gripped, whether it's the beginning of the book or the end. And he shows you so much about the character in his opening lines.

So, here are the first two paragraphs from the book:
A story has no beginning or end: arbitrarily one chooses that moment of experience from which to look back or from which, to look ahead. I say 'one chooses' with the inaccurate pride of a professional writer who - when he has been seriously noted at all - has been praised for his technical ability, but d…

The Symbiotic Relationship Between Art and Politics

Art is inherently political.

Let's just get that out of the way. We all have things we want to say (or things we want to not say) in our personal lives that shape the art we make. And artists, more often than not, are trying to say something with their art, even if their goal is to not say something.

There is no doubt that this has been a turbulent week in the country I live in. There are many of us that are confused and shocked and afraid of what might be to come in the future. That's understandable. As artists and writers, I feel like we're typically more empathetic than the general population. It's easy to think about what it's like to be in someone else's shoes because we spend so much of our creative time almost literally in someone else's shoes. And we need to pass that understanding on to our readers or viewers or however else they're consuming this art.

I've seen this troubling idea, though, that art needs to be purely for escape and that p…

Writing is Listening

In many social situations, I'm a talker. I like to think of myself as a raconteur, but it's more just like I don't know how to shut up. At least in the right situation. I've done a lot and know just a little bit about so many different things, it's easy for me to find something to talk about with people. When I can come out of my social anxiety shell, I actually like talking to people. But there are times when I can't really talk, I don't have the energy, emotional or physical, to do it. Instead, I just drink in the surroundings.

I like to listen. I like to observe.

It's something we writers have to do. We have to take in all the input we can. And sometimes that means shutting the hell up and just listening. Listen to your friends tell their stories. Listen to how they talk about other people and describe them. Listen to the words they use. Listen to the emotion in people's voices as they're talking. Watch how they talk. What sorts of things th…